Federal prosecutors charged dozens of people on Tuesday in a college-entrance scandal in which wealthy parents, including some high-profile actresses and a slew of business executives, paid bribes to get their children into top colleges across the U.S.
ome of the country’s wealthiest citizens were allegedly buying college entrance for their kids and consequently cheating other qualified students out of the running.
Justice Department officials said at a news conference in Boston on Tuesday that it’s the biggest college-entrance scandal it has ever prosecuted.
Among those charged with fraud are actresses Felicity Huffman, who starred in ABC’s “Desperate Housewives,” and Lori Loughlin, who appeared in ABC’s “Full House.” Huffman’s husband, actor William H. Macy, was not charged, although he allegedly spoke to and interacted with the schemers, who later turned witness. Among the dozens charged were several business executives like Douglas Hodge, a former CEO of Pimco investment management company, and Manuel Henriquez, chairman and CEO of Hercules Technology Growth Capital. Hercules’ stock price fell more than 9 percent Tuesday afternoon.
The indictment said that in most instances, students and children were unaware of the bribes and fraudulent activity of their parents, such as doctoring exam scores and creating fake resumes and profiles to up their chances of getting into school. Prosecutors did not charge any students or colleges.
Here’s some key points to how it all went down:
The so-called ringleader of the scandal was William Singer, founder of a college preparatory business called the Edge College & Career Network, who was arrested for running the scheme using a fraudulent charity.
His business, also known as The Key, based in California, allegedly helped students cheat on SAT and ACT exams and helped parents bribe coaches at colleges and universities to take their kids without any athletic background.
Singer pleaded guilty Tuesday to four charges: racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and obstruction of justice.
According to court documents, those charged used the “facade of the charitable organization” to hide the nature and source of bribe payments. Since Singer’s business is a nonprofit, parents could allegedly wire money into a charitable account while avoiding federal taxes.
Between 2011 and 2018, parents spent about $ 25 million in bribes to college administrators and coaches, the documents note, to designate their children as pretend recruited athletes or as members of other favored admissions categories, thus “facilitating the children’s admission to those universities.”
Singer also helped parents submit false and manipulated information about their kids’ athletic abilities, going so far as to Photoshop students’ faces onto pictures of actual athletes’ bodies found on the internet.
One parent submitted both her daughter’s fake SAT score and a profile that falsely said she was a “3-year Varsity Letter winner” in water polo, along with an altered picture, according to the indictment. In another instance, parents paid Singer more than $ 1 million to get their child into Yale with a lie that she was a captain of a soccer team.
In an email recorded in the court documents, Singer wrote: “This girl will be a midfielder and attending Yale so she has to be very good,” requesting he get “a soccer pic probably Asian girl.”
Parents also bribed athletic recruits. Loughlin allegedly “agreed to pay bribes totaling $ 500,000 in exchange for having their two daughters designated as recruits” to the University of Southern California’s crew team.
Also part of the widespread scandal was indicted parents who used several means to helps their children do better on SAT and ACT standardized exams.
These parents paid between $ 15,000 and $ 75,000 per test to the exam administrators who gave students answers, corrected their work or let others pose as the students to take the tests, according to the indictment.
Huffman used the phrase “Ruh Ro!” after finding out that her daughter’s school would be proctoring her SAT exam. Another parent, William McGlashan Jr., was instructed by Singer to claim his child had a learning disability in order to win more time for his son to take the exam alone.
According to the indictment, Singer told Gordon Caplan, a co-chairman of international law firm Willkie Farr, that he’s essentially created a “side door” for wealthy families to get their kids into college, often without the kids ever knowing that they did not really qualify for entry.
“There is a front door which means you get in on your own,” Singer said. “The back door is through institutional advancement, which is 10 times as much money. And I’ve created this side door in.”
“Nobody knows what happens,” Singer said. “She feels great about herself. She got a test a score, and now you’re actually capable for help getting into a school. Because the test score’s no longer an issue. Does that make sense?”
Let’s block ads! (Why?)