Steam Data Shows Improvement in Nvidia Turing Adoption Rates

This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

One of the situations we’ve been tracking on an ongoing basis in 2019 is the adoption rate for Nvidia’s latest GPUs. While it’s impossible to get precise figures, there are signs that Pascal’s exit from the market has improved the situation for Nvidia. Data from the Steam Hardware Survey also confirms that the situation may be improving for Nvidia, in at least in certain SKUs.

Our first data point comes from the bestselling lists at Amazon and Newegg. At Christmas and before, these lists were dominated by GTX 1080 and 1070 cards. The steady release of new cards and the retirement of old ones have changed this, and now only a relative handful of lower-end Pascal cards hold the space. The RTX and new 1660 Ti are taking over the market, as predicted.

Steam’s Hardware Survey data isn’t perfect. 10-12 percent of the GPUsSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce it surveys are listed as “Other” in the list, which means there’s a substantial amount of baked-in inaccuracy. It’s a trailing list, which means we see the data for the month previously, and we don’t know when GPUs accrue enough market share to claim space. The cut-off looks to be ~0.15 percent, based on our data.

In the slideshow below, we’ve compared adoption rates for Turing and Pascal using the Wayback Machine to retrieve data from older versions of the Steam Hardware Survey. This month, we’ve added data for the GTX 1080 TiSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce, though there’s a limit to how much of this we can use. August 2017 is when the Steam Hardware Survey first began throwing odd data as a result of a massive influx of new players. For now, it’s a non-issue, since we only have two months’ worth of sales data for the RTX 2080 Ti in the first place.

In the slideshow below, we’ve compared the relative adoption rates of the two GPU families. First, we’ve compared directly across the market: 1080 versus 2080, 1070 versus 2070, etc. We’ve also included two targeted comparisons that align to price boundaries: GTX 1080 versus RTX 2070, and GTX 1080 Ti versus RTX 2080. The RTX 2060 and GTX 1660 Ti are not included in this evaluation because those cards have not yet appeared in the Steam Hardware Survey. The number of GPUs in the “Other” category on Steam has been creeping up, however, implying they could soon be added.

The x-axis is labeled with numbers instead of months because we’re working with GPUs that launched in different time periods and can’t do a straight month-on-month comparison. The fact that Turing benefits from a Christmas sales cycle while Pascal has not (at the relevant periods contemplated in our timeline) will be ‘fixed’ in three more months. The table below the slideshow summarizes our results.

Last month, we noted that adoption rates between the RTX 2080SEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce and RTX 2070 were nearly identical. That’s no longer the case — the RTX 2070 has pulled significantly ahead of the RTX 2080, at 0.5 percent uptake. This compares poorly against the GTX 1070, but the price-equal comparison between the GTX 1080 and the RTX 2070 is a fairer way to compare the two, in our opinion. The GTX 1080 was still decisively ahead of the RTX 2070 at the same point in its life cycle, but the gap is much smaller.

GPU-Turing-Pascal-Comparison

We’ve added the GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti as well, and a comparison between the RTX 2080 and the GTX 1080 Ti. In this case, we’ve had to omit a month from the GTX 1080 Ti — the third month of adoption data for that GPU slams into the August 2017 discontinuity in the Steam Hardware Survey data. The first two months of data show much stronger adoption rates for the 1080 Ti compared to either of the two Turing cards, though the RTX 2080 is in a stronger position.

Now Read:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

ExtremeTechGaming – ExtremeTech