Beijing can still engineer growth on paper — at an ever-increasing cost, according to a report released on Wednesday.
“I don’t think people understood the level (to which) there was a decision by Beijing, they were going to reverse course on deleveraging and all the progress they made,” Leland Miller, chief executive officer of China Beige Book, said in a phone interview. “The idea that deleveraging has continued through 2018 and into 2019, that’s laughable.”
The firm publishes a quarterly review of the economy based on a survey of more than 3,300 Chinese businesses.
Growth in the world’s second largest economy slowed last year under pressure from Beijing’s efforts to reduce reliance on debt — which critics say was overly harsh — and trade tensions with the U.S. In the second half of last year, Beijing jumped to stimulate with announcements of cuts to taxes and financing costs.
In the months since, the Chinese government has also repeatedly told the large state-owned banks to lend to smaller, privately-run businesses. Those firms contribute to the bulk of economic growth and employment but have traditionally had a more difficult time getting loans than the larger, state-owned corporations, causing many to turn to shadow banking. To alleviate the situation, the People’s Bank of China even announced in December a special tool for lending to smaller businesses called the Targeted Medium-Term Lending Facility.
All those efforts have opened the spigots of financing. The China Beige Book found that the rate of borrowing by private companies in the first quarter was greater than that of state-owned enterprises.
The survey also found that reports of corporate borrowing reached the highest point since the middle of 2013. More worryingly, the survey said the proportion of loans made through the murky world of shadow banking increased for a second-straight quarter to the highest level since the second quarter of 2016, another period marked by stimulus.
However, the cost of that borrowing increased. Every single sector and region of China saw credit costs rise in the first quarter compared with the prior quarter, the report said. The average bank loan rate was up 101 basis points to 6.9 percent, and the average non-bank rate up 426 basis points to 11.42 percent.
“They’re going to have to subsidize the rates if they want this to continue,” Miller said. “Again, this is China (but just) because they’re able to foster a rebound in Q1 doesn’t mean the rest of 2019 is going to be a clear rally.”
A short-term alleviation in China’s growth concerns could be a welcome turn of events for global investors. The Shanghai composite was one of the worst performing stock indexes in the world last year, but is up more than 20 percent for 2019 so far.
“In China what really regulates growth is, at least at the moment, the availability of liquidity. And the availability of liquidity is a government-directed thing,” David Wong, partner at Asian alternative investment group PAG, said during a panel at the AVCJ China Forum in Beijing last week.
Besides, debt fears could be overblown, according to Wong. From a leverage perspective, the dollar-denominated debt of the Chinese government and corporations in the country is “minuscule” compared with the levels of most southeast Asian countries during the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s, he said.
“Given this (and the tax revenue base), I think we’re not at an overleveraged situation in China,” Wong said. “Therefore in the foreseeable future this supercycle of growth would continue, until the point that leverage cannot continue to be sustained, even within a closed capital account system.”